Slashdot recently featured a post referring to a CNET post that referred to a Detroit News editorial lambasting Michigan's House of Representatives' Democrats' budget plan for 2008 that proposes spending $38 million to give every student in the state an iPod.
Or so one might think if they just looked at the vitriolic headlines and following discussion.
I've spent at least a total of 2 to 3 hours now searching for a specific iPod-related proposal, and I can't find anything. What I have found is that the Michigan House Democrats are calling their 2008 budget proposal the Road Map to Michigan's Recovery. The closest I've come is a reference to $38 million in iPod or MP3 player funding in a Detroit Free Press article reporting on the Road Map proposal.
So, is the lambasting here based on some type of insider knowledge that wasn't attributed or referenced (as in, information on a specific funding bill or proposal, and / or the name of the politician sponsoring it)? Is the proposal simply for educational technology funding, which people are assuming is for items like iPods? Is the proposal moot anyway because the sponsors of the bill are a political minority? It's certainly important to recognize that Michigan is facing some serious financial problems, but should this idea be rejected without consideration so that the state can focus on core services? As a technology-oriented teacher, I'd love it if all of my students had iPods. However, it'd take me a considerable amount of work and effort to use the new tool effectively - so hopefully, if true, the $38 million includes a significant amount of funding for teacher training - not on how to use an iPod, but how to integrate it successfully into an educational experience.
Time will tell whether or not the Michigan iPod controversy is legitimate, but it serves as the basis for good discussion. First, this kind of contentious proposal should be on the web before it hits the press - people will inevitably have questions, and primary documentation has proved to be difficult to find. Second, it's important to discuss the need to invest in education even in times of financial stress. Third, the cultural phenomenon of the iPod can't be ignored by educators, and, as with other technological and cultural innovations, should probably be embraced. Finally, the integration of technology in the classroom is difficult - educational processes have inertia, teachers are already largely working at capacity, and adding another widget in the mix is not always welcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Well, after further investigation I have basically found the same sort of circular referencing back to the Detroit News article. The best discussion I have found was on the Moderate Voice blog.
Many people did the same kind of searching that the two of us have done and came up with very little concrete evidence of a democratic proposal for buying iPods. There does seem to be clear evidence that the Dems want to increase per pupil spending by $200.
My concern with such a plan, much like Mr. P's is not that I personally don't see the utility in having iPods as part of my teaching/learning arsenal, but rather the phenomenon of legislatures just throwing money at problems and not really considering how a tool impacts the classroom and learning. I think we have seen this problem in Maine with our Laptop initiative. The more important investment, I think, would be in training teachers in technology integration and how to use tech tools effectively.
There's a nice online bibliography of iPod use in education here .
Post a Comment